Site Loader
Get a Quote
Rock Street, San Francisco

A Proficient Design of Approximate Multiplier
Abstract: In this paper, an approximate multiplier that is high speed yet energy efficient, for error resilient applications is proposed. In this new design approach for 16 bit approximation of multiplier, partial products of the multiplier are altered to introduce varying probability terms. Logic complexity of approximation is varied for the accumulation of altered partial products based on their probability. Synthesis results reveal that proposed multiplier achieves better performance, compared to an exact multiplier when done in XILINX 13.2. They have better precision when compared to existing approximate multipliers.
Index Terms— Approximate computing, error analysis, low error, low power, multipliers.INTRODUCTION
Energy minimization is one of the main design requirements in almost any electronic systems, especially the portable ones such as smart phones, tablets, and different gadgets. It is highly desired to achieve this minimization with minimal performance (speed) penalty. Digital signal processing (DSP) blocks are key components of these portable devices for realizing various multimedia applications. The computational core of these blocks is the arithmetic logic unit where multiplications have the greatest share among all arithmetic operations performed in these DSP systems. Therefore, improving the speed and power/energy-efficiency characteristics of multipliers plays a key role in improving the efficiency of processors. Many of the DSP cores implement image and video processing algorithms where final outputs are either images or videos prepared for human consumptions. This fact enables us to use approximations for improving the speed/energy efficiency. This originates from the limited perceptual abilities of human beings in observing an image or a video. In addition to the image and video processing applications, there are other areas where the exactness of the arithmetic operations is not critical to the functionality of the system. Being able to use the approximate computing provides the designer with the ability of making tradeoffs between the accuracy and the speed as well as power/energy consumption. Applying the approximation to the arithmetic units can be performed at different design abstraction levels including circuit, logic, and architecture levels, as well as algorithm and software layers. The approximation may be performed using different techniques such as allowing some timing violations (e.g., voltage over scaling or over clocking) and function approximation methods (e.g., modifying the Boolean function of a circuit) or a combination of them. In the category of function approximation methods, a number of approximating arithmetic building blocks, such as adders and multipliers, at different design levels have been suggested.

To reduce hardware complexity of multipliers, truncation is widely employed in fixed-width multiplier designs. Then a constant or variable correction term is added to compensate for the quantization error introduced by the truncated part. Approximation techniques in multipliers focus on accumulation of partial products, which is crucial in terms of power consumption. Broken array multiplier is implemented, where the least significant bits of inputs are truncated, while forming partial products to reduce hardware complexity. The proposed multiplier in saves fewadder circuits in partial product accumulation.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

LITERATURE REVIEW
Low-Power Digital Signal Processing Using Approximate Adders
Low power is an imperative requirement for portable multimedia devices employing various signal processing algorithms and architectures. In most multimedia applications, human beings can gather useful information from slightly erroneous outputs. Therefore, we do not need to produce exactly correct numerical outputs. Previous research in this context exploits error resiliency primarily through voltage over scaling, utilizing algorithmic and architectural techniques to mitigate the resulting errors. In this paper, we propose logic complexity reduction at the transistor level as an alternative approach to take advantage of the relaxation of numerical accuracy. We demonstrate this concept by proposing various imprecise or approximate full adder cells with reduced complexity at the transistor level, and utilize them to design approximate multi-bit adders. In addition to the inherent reduction in switched capacitance, our techniques result in significantly shorter critical paths, enabling voltage scaling. We design architectures for video and image compression algorithms using the proposed approximate arithmetic units and evaluate them to demonstrate the efficacy of our approach. We also derive simple mathematical models for error and power consumption of these approximate adders. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of these approximate adders in two digital signal processing architectures (discrete cosine transform and finite impulse response filter) with specific quality constraints. Simulation results indicate up to 69% power savings using the proposed approximate adders, when compared to existing implementations using accurate adders.
The variable correction truncated multiplier is introduced. This is a method for minimizing the error of a truncated multiplier. The error is reduced by using information from the partial product bits of the column adjacent to the truncated LSB. This results in a complexity savings while introducing minimum distortion to the result.

EXACT MULTIPLIER.

Booth Multiplier:
Multiplication consists of three steps:
1) The first step to generate the partial products;
2) The second step to add the generated partial products until the last two rows are remained;
3) The third step to compute the final multiplication results by adding the last two rows.
The modified Booth algorithm reduces the number of partial products by half in the first step. We used the modified Booth encoding (MBE) scheme proposed in. It is known as the most efficient Booth encoding and decoding scheme. To multiply X by Y using the modified Booth algorithm starts from grouping Y by three bits and encoding into one of {-2, -1, 0, 1, 2}. Table I shows the rules to generate the encoded signals by MBE scheme shows the corresponding logic diagram. The Booth decoder generates the partial products using the encoded signals as show.

Fig.1 Booth Encoder

Fig.2 Booth Decoder
Fig 1.2 shows the generated partial products and sign extension scheme of the 8-bit modified Booth multiplier. The partial products generated by the modified Booth algorithm are added in parallel using the Wallace tree until the last two rows are remained. The final multiplication results are generated by adding the last two rows. The carry propagation adder is usually used in this step
TABLE I
Truth table for MBE Scheme

PROPOSED SYSTEM
Implementation of multiplier comprises three steps: generation of partial products, partial products reduction tree, and finally, a vector merge addition to produce final product from the sum and carry rows generated from the reduction tree. Second step consumes more power. In this brief, approximation is applied in reduction tree stage.

Fig. 3: Transformation of generated partial products into altered partial products
TABLE II

A 8-bit unsigned multiplier is used for illustration to describe the proposed method in approximation of multipliers. Consider two 8-bit unsigned input operands ? = m=07?m2m and ? = n=07?n2n. The partial product a m , n = ? m · ? n in Fig. 3 is the result of AND operation between the bits of ? m and ? n . From statistical point of view, the partial product a m , n has a probability of 1 / 4 of being 1. In the columns containing more than three partial products, the partial products a m , n and a n , m are combined to form propogate and generate signals as given in (1). The resulting propogate and generate signals form altered partial products p m , n and g m , n . From column 3 with weight 23 to column 11 with weight 2 11 , the partial products a m , n and a n , m are replaced by altered partial products p m , n and g m , n . The original and transformed partial product matrices are shown in Fig. 3

The probability of the altered partial product g m , n being one is 1 / 16, which is significantly lower than 1 / 4of a m , n . The probability of altered partial product p m, n being one is 1 / 16 + 3 / 16 + 3 / 16 = 7 / 16, which is higher than g m , n . These factors are considered, while applying approximation to the altered partial product matrix.

Approximation of Altered Partial Products g m , n
The accumulation of generate signals is done column wise. As each element has a probability of 1/ 16 of being one, two elements being 1 in the same column even decreases. For example, in a column with 4 generate signals, probability of all numbers being 0 is ( 1 ? pr ) 4 , only one element being one is 4 pr ( 1 ? pr ) 3 , the probability of two elements being one in the column is 6 pr 2 ( 1 ? pr ) 2 , three ones is 4 pr 3 ( 1 ? pr ) and probability of all elements being 1 is pr 4 ,where pr is 1 / 16. The probability statistics for a number of generate elements m in each column are given in Table II. Based on Table II, using OR gate in the accumulation of column wise generate elements in the altered partial product matrix provides exact result in most of the cases. The probability of error ( P err ) while using OR gate for reduction of generate signals in each column is also listed in Table II. As can be seen, the probability of misprediction is very low. As the number of generate signals increases, the error probability increases linearly. However, the value of error also rises. To prevent this, the maximum number of generate signals to be grouped by OR gate is kept at 4. For a column having m generate signals, OR gates are used.

The proposed approximate technique can be applied to signed multiplication including Booth multipliers as well, except it is not applied to sign extension bit
TABLE III

TABLE IV

Approximation of Other Partial Products
The accumulation of other partial products with probability 1 / 4 for a m , n and 7 / 16 for p m , n uses approximate circuits. Approximate half-adder, full-adder, and 4-2 compressor are proposed for their accumulation. Carry and Sum are two outputs of these approximate circuits. Since Carry has higher weight of binary bit, error in Carry bit will contribute more by producing error difference of two in the output. Approximation is handled in such a way that the absolute difference between actual output and approximate output is always maintained as one. Hence Carry outputs are approximated only for the cases, where Sum is approximated. In adders and compressors, XOR gates tend to contribute to high area and delay. For approximating half-adder, XOR gate of Sum is replaced with OR gate as given in (2). This results in one error in the Sum computation as seen in the truth table of approximate half-adder in Table II. A tick mark denotes that approximate output matches with correct output and cross mark denotes mismatch

In the approximation of full-adder, one of the two XOR gates is replaced with OR gate in Sum calculation. This results in error in last two cases out of eight cases. Carry is modified as in (3) introducing one error. This provides more simplification, while maintaining the difference between original and approximate value as one. The truth table of approximate full-adder is given in Table III

Two approximate 4-2 compressors produce nonzero output even for the cases where all inputs are zero. This results in high ED and high degree of precision loss especially in cases of zeros in all bits or in most significant parts of the reduction tree. The proposed 4-2 compressor overcomes this drawback. In 4-2 compressor, three bits are required for the output only when all the four inputs are 1, which happens only once out of 16 cases.

TABLE V

Fig. 4. Reduction of altered partial products.This property is taken to eliminate one of the three output bits in 4-2 compressor. To maintain minimal error difference as one, the output “100” (the value of 4) for four inputs being one has to be replaced with outputs “11” (the value of 3). For Sum computation, one out of three XOR gates is replaced with OR gate. Also, to make the Sum corresponding to the case where all inputs are ones as one, an additional circuit x 1 · x 2 · x 3 · x 4 is added to the Sum expression. This results in error in five out of 16 cases. Carry is simplified as in (4). The corresponding truth table is given in Table V.

Fig. 4 shows the reduction of altered partial product matrix of 8 × 8 approximate multiplier. It requires two stages to produce sum and carry outputs for vector merge addition step. Four 2-input OR gates, four 3-input OR gates, and one 4-input OR gates are required for the reduction of generate signals from columns 3 to 11. The resultant signals of OR gates are labeled as G i corresponding to the column i with weight 2i . For reducing other partial products, 3 approximate half-adders, 3 approximate full-adders, and 3 approximate compressors are required in the first stage to produce Sum and Carry signals, S i and C i corresponding to column i . The elements in the second stage are reduced using 1 approximate half-adder and 11 approximate full-adders producing final two operands x i and y i to be fed to ripple carry adder for the final computation of the result.

Two Variants of Multipliers
Two variants of multipliers are proposed. In the first case (Multi- plier1), approximation is applied in all columns of partial products of n -bit multiplier, whereas in Multiplier2, approximate circuits are used in n ? 1 least significant columns.

CONCLUSION
In this brief, to propose efficient approximate multipliers, partial products of the multiplier are modified using generate and propagate signals. Approximation is applied using simple OR gate for altered generate partial products. Approximate half-adder, full-adder, and 4-2 compressor are proposed to reduce remaining partial products. Designed approximate multiplier outperforms more than existing designs. They are also found to have better precision when compared to existing approximate multiplier designs. The proposed multiplier designs can be used in applications with minimal loss in output quality while saving significant power and area.

REFERENCES
1 V. Gupta, D. Mohapatra, A. Raghunathan, and K. Roy, “Low-power digital signal processing using approximate adders,” IEEE Trans. Comput.- Aided Design Integr. Circuits Syst., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 124–137, Jan. 2013.
2 E. J. King and E. E. Swartzlander, Jr., “Data-dependent truncation scheme for parallel multipliers,” in Proc. 31st Asilomar Conf. Signals, Circuits Syst., Nov. 1998, pp. 1178–1182.
3 K.-J. Cho, K.-C. Lee, J.-G. Chung, and K. K. Parhi, “Design of low-error fixed-width modified booth multiplier,” IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 522–531, May 2004.

4 H. R. Mahdiani, A. Ahmadi, S. M. Fakhraie, and C. Lucas, “Bio-inspired imprecise computational blocks for efficient VLSI implementation of soft-computing applications,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 850–862, Apr. 2010.
5 A. Momeni, J. Han, P. Montuschi, and F. Lombardi, “Design and analysis of approximate compressors for multiplication,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 984–994, Apr. 2015.
6 S. Narayanamoorthy, H. A. Moghaddam, Z. Liu, T. Park, and N. S. Kim, “Energy-efficient approximate multiplication for digital signal processing and classification applications,” IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1180–1184, Jun. 2015.
7 G. Zervakis, K. Tsoumanis, S. Xydis, D. Soudris, and K. Pekmestzi, “Design-efficient approximate multiplication circuits through partial product perforation,” IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 3105–3117, Oct. 2016.
8 P. Kulkarni, P. Gupta, and M. D. Ercegovac, “Trading accuracy for power in a multiplier architecture,” J. Low Power Electron., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 490–501, 2011.
9 C.-H. Lin and C. Lin, “High accuracy approximate multiplier with error correction,” in Proc. IEEE 31st Int. Conf. Comput. Design, Sep. 2013, pp. 33–38.
10 C. Liu, J. Han, and F. Lombardi, “A low-power, high-performance approximate multiplier with configurable partial error recovery,” in Proc. Conf. Exhibit. (DATE), 2014, pp. 1–4.
11 R. Venkatesan, A. Agarwal, K. Roy, and A. Raghunathan, “MACACO: Modeling and analysis of circuits for approximate computing,” in Proc. IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Comput.-Aided Design (ICCAD), Oct. 2011, pp. 667–673.
12 J. Liang, J. Han, and F. Lombardi, “New metrics for the reliability of approximate and probabilistic adders,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 1760–1771, Sep. 2013.
13 S. Suman et al., “Image enhancement using geometric mean filter and gamma correction for WCE iamges,” in Proc. 21st Int. Conf., Neural Inf. Process. (ICONIP), 2014, pp. 276–283.

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Victoria

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out
x

Hi!
I'm Jeremy!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out